MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 135%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 139%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics149% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive131% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
22 months ago, 22 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C91
MotherboardMSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)  (all builds)
Memory24.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210115
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 23 '22 at 18:36
Run Duration291 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
Memory 77.1
1-Core 148
2-Core 290
92% 172 Pts
4-Core 571
8-Core 1009
95% 790 Pts
64-Core 1,487
92% 1,487 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Asus(1043 87BC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
149% Outstanding
Lighting 219
Reflection 204
Parallax 195
179% 206 fps
MRender 192
Gravity 150
Splatting 134
127% 159 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 149%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar 1TB SSD 1TB
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 758 809 700 351 333 108 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 681
Write 764
Mixed 698
SusWrite 510
150% 663 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 36.7
168% 74.9 MB/s
DQ Read 243
DQ Write 751
DQ Mixed 274
274% 423 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 131%
Great: 483%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 497GB
266GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 369 381 387 393 390 383 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Read 391
Write 411
Mixed 248
SusWrite 384
81% 358 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 39.8
4K Mixed 21.2
74% 26 MB/s
DQ Read 75.3
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 99.7
109% 173 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 128%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 237GB
221GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 96 108 108 100 112 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36% Below average
Read 99.9
Write 167
Mixed 150
SusWrite 108
30% 131 MB/s
4K Read 16
4K Write 34.6
4K Mixed 17.9
66% 22.8 MB/s
DQ Read 77.3
DQ Write 157
DQ Mixed 60.7
62% 98.4 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 36%
Great: 100%
Amd-raid KINGSTON SV300S3 480GB
447GB free
Firmware: 520A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 251 219 211 182 223 214 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 371
Write 270
Mixed 274
SusWrite 217
63% 283 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 15.8
4K Mixed 17.7
62% 17.9 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 77.5
DQ Mixed 63.5
56% 86.1 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KD4AGU880-36A180T 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77.9% Very good
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 31.5
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 22.3
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 30.5
69% 24.2 GB/s
Latency 86.1
46% 86.1 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) Builds (Compare 17,534 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $896
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback