Today's hottest deals

To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 19%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory0.5 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201124
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateJul 30 '22 at 10:43
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 6700-$192
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Memory 71.6
1-Core 32.2
2-Core 62.7
38% 55.5 Pts
4-Core 47.2
8-Core 43.2
6% 45.2 Pts
64-Core 41.7
3% 41.7 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel G41 Express Chipset
Intel(8086 2E32) 783MB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.72% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 0.7
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.53 fps
MRender 0.5
Gravity 5
Splatting 0.4
2% 1.97 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.72%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
128GB 128GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ZD0R3G07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 141 76 75 57 17 MB/s
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.7% Below average
Read 150
Write 180
Mixed 126
SusWrite 86.3
31% 136 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 29.6
4K Mixed 21.4
72% 23.4 MB/s
DQ Read 25.4
DQ Write 63.2
DQ Mixed 33.3
29% 40.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 91%
Jmicron Tech 128GB
97GB free
Firmware: 3202
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 10 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
6.02% Terrible
Read 10.5
Write 9.2
Mixed 10.7
SusWrite 10.4
8% 10.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
47% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.02%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
10.9% Very poor
MC Read 4
MC Write 3.1
MC Mixed 2.2
9% 3.1 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 2
SC Mixed 0.8
5% 1.87 GB/s
Latency 97.8
41% 97.8 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,800 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback