Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JF_X515JF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive213% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 83% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JF_X515JF  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X515JF
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220704
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 31 '22 at 20:48
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU1%
CPU Throttled 83%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1035G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Memory 78.5
1-Core 125
2-Core 249
83% 151 Pts
4-Core 374
8-Core 502
56% 438 Pts
64-Core 491
30% 491 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia MX130
Asus(1043 1EFF) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.1659
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Lighting 13.3
Reflection 12.1
Parallax 12.7
11% 12.7 fps
MRender 12.4
Gravity 14.1
Splatting 9.4
10% 12 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SM2P32A8-256GC1 256GB
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VC0S0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1435 1466 1263 52 55 59 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
213% Outstanding
Read 1,495
Write 1,463
Mixed 1,269
SusWrite 722
278% 1,237 MB/s
4K Read 53.2
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 73.7
258% 94.3 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 921
DQ Mixed 582
464% 630 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 213%
Great: 213%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: JU0C2J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 133 132 134 134 134 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Read 121
Write 128
Mixed 57
SusWrite 133
80% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 6.5
4K Mixed 0.6
237% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
WHS84S8AZ 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
43.2% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 11.6
41% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 12.3
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 83.3
48% 83.3 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JF_X515JF Builds (Compare 402 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JF_X515JF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback