Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME Q270M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics29.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Q270M-C  (all builds)
Memory26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171211
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateAug 02 '22 at 08:52
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$100
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Memory 92.9
1-Core 128
2-Core 250
88% 157 Pts
4-Core 458
8-Core 678
71% 568 Pts
64-Core 663
41% 663 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.6% Poor
Lighting 37.3
Reflection 42.3
Parallax 38.9
30% 39.5 fps
MRender 38.2
Gravity 39
Splatting 28.3
28% 35.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 250GB
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT21B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 336 279 297 297 297 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 515
Write 414
Mixed 351
SusWrite 307
89% 397 MB/s
4K Read 48.3
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 57.4
209% 74.6 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 326
255% 352 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 120%
Great: 126%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$91
3TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 207 207 206 208 195 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 206
Write 171
Mixed 87.1
SusWrite 202
122% 167 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 117%
Great: 113%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$14
48GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 6.6 6.7 6.6 6.7 6.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
6.11% Terrible
Read 22.6
Write 10.5
Mixed 14.1
SusWrite 6.6
16% 13.4 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.5
39% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.11%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
77% Very good
MC Read 28
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 23.9
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 25.4
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 62.4
64% 62.4 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 77%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Q270M-C Builds (Compare 247 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Q270M-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback