Asus H110M-CS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H110M-CS  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190703
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateAug 03 '22 at 06:29
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
77.8% Very good
Memory 89.2
1-Core 113
2-Core 217
80% 140 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 486
54% 425 Pts
64-Core 485
30% 485 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.5% Poor
Lighting 37.2
Reflection 40.9
Parallax 37.8
30% 38.6 fps
MRender 36.9
Gravity 39
Splatting 28.5
28% 34.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$51
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF220400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 57 74 113 115 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
38.8% Below average
Read 406
Write 256
Mixed 169
SusWrite 113
52% 236 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 15
4K Mixed 6.8
46% 13.8 MB/s
DQ Read 40.5
DQ Write 60.8
DQ Mixed 18
23% 39.8 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 55%
Jmicron Generic 1TB
155GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 40 40 41 42 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
22.7% Poor
Read 38.6
Write 40.1
Mixed 20.6
SusWrite 40.5
26% 34.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
56% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 79%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013)
64GB free
Firmware: 0508
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 41 40 41 42 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
23% Poor
Read 38.9
Write 40.4
Mixed 27.6
SusWrite 40.6
27% 36.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 23%
Great: 63%
Sony Hard Drive 1TB
45GB free, PID 0b7d
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.6 0.3 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Read 59.5
Write 45.8
Mixed 26
SusWrite 0.5
39% 33 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 48%
WD My Passport 25E1 2TB
405GB free, PID 25e1
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 44 45 45 46 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
23.7% Poor
Read 44.7
Write 42.7
Mixed 31.4
SusWrite 44.9
55% 40.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
114% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68% Good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 25.4
MC Mixed 20
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 24.7
SC Mixed 21.1
58% 20.4 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 68%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-CS Builds (Compare 899 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H110M-CS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $182
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback