Asus TUF B350M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics53.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive201% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF B350M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170908
Uptime4.4 Days
Run DateOct 19 '17 at 01:52
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
45.6% Average
Memory 56.2
1-Core 40.1
2-Core 71.9
36% 56.1 Pts
4-Core 187
8-Core 588
42% 387 Pts
64-Core 1,071
66% 1,071 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Nvidia(10DE 13C0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 385.69
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53.4% Above average
Lighting 64.3
Reflection 76.8
Parallax 71.5
52% 70.9 fps
MRender 75.9
Gravity 68.5
Splatting 61.3
55% 68.6 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
201% Outstanding
Read 2,529
Write 1,059
Mixed 1,264
354% 1,617 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 52.4
4K Mixed 21
110% 36.6 MB/s
DQ Read 60
DQ Write 80
DQ Mixed 35
36% 58.4 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 201%
Great: 236%
Amd-raid TOSHIBA HDWE140 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: FP2A
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Read 69.8
Write 65.2
Mixed 79.6
54% 71.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.03
4K Mixed 0.24
106% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 105%
Amd-raid Array 1 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 9.0
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 149
Write 102
Mixed 134
97% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 1.93
4K Mixed 0.42
108% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 207%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$171
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.2% Very good
MC Read 30.1
MC Write 27.8
MC Mixed 26.3
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 18.2
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 139
29% 139 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B350M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 342 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus TUF B350M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $290
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback