Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive69.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemGigabyte AB350-Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming-CF  (all builds)
Memory16.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200702
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateAug 08 '22 at 19:28
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$235
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
66.9% Good
Memory 69.2
1-Core 112
2-Core 179
69% 120 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 621
58% 485 Pts
64-Core 893
55% 893 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$237
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
111% Outstanding
Lighting 146
Reflection 163
Parallax 152
119% 154 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 160
Splatting 111
104% 129 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 111%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 204 134 126 131 126 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
69.5% Good
Read 414
Write 357
Mixed 358
SusWrite 182
74% 328 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 56.9
4K Mixed 31.9
112% 38.6 MB/s
DQ Read 212
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 156
118% 160 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 134%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
345GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 379 394 404 413 420 418 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Read 407
Write 416
Mixed 379
SusWrite 405
91% 402 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 67.9
4K Mixed 37.8
131% 45.5 MB/s
DQ Read 293
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 294
219% 290 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 133%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
55GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 154 151 155 157 156 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Read 101
Write 80.2
Mixed 71.2
SusWrite 154
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 112%
VendorCo ProductCode 4GB
4GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 6.3 6.3 6.4 6.1 6.4 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
3.53% Terrible
Read 12.9
Write 4
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 6
8% 6.77 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
6% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.53%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$100
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
59.5% Above average
MC Read 22.4
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 22.1
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 19.9
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AB350-Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 1,174 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $347
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback