Casper EXCALIBUR G770

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	126% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

20 months ago, 20 months ago.

System	Casper EXCALIBUR G770 (all builds)
Motherboard	CASPER NLAI 001
Memory	4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200914
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 16 '22 at 17:22
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10750H 206,796 User benchmarks, average bench 77% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	57.9% Above average	Memory 77.7 1-Core 76.4 2-Core 136 59% 96.7 Pts	4-Core 209 8-Core 290 31% 249 Pts	64-Core 346 21% 346 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 57.9% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Quanta(152D 1244) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7642 Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	3.54% Terrible	Lighting 3.5 Reflection 30 Parallax 4.8 3% 12.8 fps	MRender 6.5 Gravity 4.4 Splatting 6.7 5% 5.87 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.54% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 128GB 11,069 User benchmarks, average bench 176% 78GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXB7401Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 191 168 168 165 168 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	126% Outstanding	Read 981 Write 749 Mixed 484 SusWrite 176 132% 597 MB/s	4K Read 44.3 4K Write 79.3 4K Mixed 53 177% 58.9 MB/s	DQ Read 554 DQ Write 398 DQ Mixed 468 352% 473 MB/s
Poor: 108% ↑ This bench: 126% Great: 234%
Toshiba HDWL110 1TB 7,333 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 871GB free Firmware: JU000A SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 132 139 140 133 137 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	79.2% Very good	Read 140 Write 126 Mixed 53.7 SusWrite 135 83% 114 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 5.9 4K Mixed 0.6 234% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 79.2% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 1x8GB 20,126 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing below potential (53^rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	38.4% Below average	MC Read 14.3 MC Write 13.2 MC Mixed 9.8 36% 12.4 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 17.2 SC Mixed 13.8 41% 14.4 GB/s	Latency 84.9 47% 84.9 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 38.4% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EXCALIBUR G770 Builds (Compare 3,267 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Casper EXCALIBUR G770

CPU
Core i5-10300HIntelBench 74%, 82,821 samples	714x
Core i5-11400HIntelBench 80%, 35,470 samples	631x
Core i5-9300HIntelBench 65%, 116,682 samples	536x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	738x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	454x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 4%, 25,082 samples	351x

SSD
P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBCrucial $45Bench 166%, 55,360 samples	646x
SA400M8240G 240GBKingstonBench 70%, 27,523 samples	376x
SSD 500GBKioxia-exceriaBench 175%, 10,941 samples	323x

RAM
CT16G4SFRA32A.M16FRS 1x16GBCrucialBench 44%, 1,443 samples	469x
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 1x8GBMicronBench 38%, 20,126 samples	255x
CT16G4SFRA32A.C8FE 1x16GBCrucialBench 45%, 941 samples	197x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $45

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16