TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Alaska A_M_I_

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAlaska A_M_I_  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory6.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220430
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 20 '22 at 21:38
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J4125
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
32.6% Below average
Memory 33.2
1-Core 50.5
2-Core 105
34% 62.8 Pts
4-Core 180
8-Core 212
25% 196 Pts
64-Core 180
11% 180 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑
This bench: 32.6%
 Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
2.02% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 2.1
Parallax 1.7
2% 1.97 fps
MRender 3.5
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 3.7
3% 3.13 fps
Poor: 1% ↑
This bench: 2.02%
 Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
FPT310M8SSD256G 256GB
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HAFEB2.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 237 179 143 141 289 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
42.6% Average
Read 285
Write 163
Mixed 175
SusWrite 214
47% 209 MB/s
4K Read 12.9
4K Write 33.5
4K Mixed 11.9
52% 19.4 MB/s
DQ Read 49.6
DQ Write 52.6
DQ Mixed 45
36% 49.1 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑
This bench: 42.6%
 Great: 69%
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$59
0GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 319
Write 313
Mixed 296
69% 310 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 63.4
4K Mixed 41.1
137% 46 MB/s
DQ Read 311
DQ Write 254
DQ Mixed 279
210% 281 MB/s
Poor: 73% Great: 130%
SMI USB DISK 64GB
59GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 25 29 28 29 30 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Read 30.8
Write 30.1
Mixed 29.7
SusWrite 28.5
41% 29.8 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.8
52% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑
This bench: 12.7%
 Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x3GB
4 of 4 slots used
12GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
23.6% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 8.7
MC Mixed 10.9
26% 9.17 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 3.3
10% 3.5 GB/s
Latency 237
17% 237 ns
Poor: 13% ↑
This bench: 23.6%
 Great: 28%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical A_M_I_ Builds (Compare 598 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Alaska A_M_I_

CPU
Celeron J4125IntelBench 35%, 2,594 samples289x
N100IntelBench 50%, 2,388 samples67x
Core i7-10810UIntelBench 70%, 612 samples62x
GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples300x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 6,852 samples77x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 3%, 2,359 samples67x
SSD
N900-512 512GBBench 75%, 91 samples31x
256GB 256GBKimtigoBench 114%, 291 samples24x
FPT310M4SSD128G 128GBBench 72%, 20 samples24x
RAM
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples208x
123456789012345678 4x3GBABCDBench 23%, 488 samples67x
4x4GBMicronBench 53%, 324 samples46x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback