Intel JSL MRD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemIntel Jasper Lake Client Platform
MotherboardIntel JSL MRD  (all builds)
Memory8.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220913
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 20 '22 at 16:06
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N5105
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Memory 38.4
1-Core 67.7
2-Core 137
44% 81.2 Pts
4-Core 224
8-Core 222
30% 223 Pts
64-Core 226
14% 226 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1994
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
4.42% Terrible
Lighting 4.7
Reflection 7.3
Parallax 4.9
4% 5.63 fps
MRender 7.8
Gravity 4.6
Splatting 7.7
6% 6.7 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.42%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
FPT310M8SSD256G 256GB
203GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HAFEB2.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 318 304 194 158 169 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
69% Good
Read 383
Write 304
Mixed 292
SusWrite 238
68% 304 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 47.5
4K Mixed 22.6
90% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 244
DQ Write 285
DQ Mixed 196
167% 242 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 69%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 2x6GB
2 of 2 slots used
12GB Row of chips LPDDR4 3733 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.3% Below average
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 14.4
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 9.8
27% 9.43 GB/s
Latency 210
19% 210 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 18: 1R 2G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
18% 22% 46 62 47 60 21.9" 1360 768 BBY0032 NS-19E310A13
Typical JSL MRD Builds (Compare 527 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel JSL MRD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback