Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	23% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel @ 2.40GHz 2 User benchmarks, average bench 39% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	33.4% Below average	Memory 57.3 1-Core 30.1 2-Core 36.7 30% 41.4 Pts	4-Core 55.8 8-Core 68 8% 61.9 Pts	64-Core 60.7 4% 60.7 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 33.4% Great: 44%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN128HAHQ-000H1 128GB 714 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 96GB free (System drive) Firmware: MVT03H3Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 6.5 7.7 7.3 17 80 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	23% Poor	Read 97.6 Write 95.5 Mixed 90.6 SusWrite 22.8 17% 76.6 MB/s	4K Read 11.3 4K Write 18.1 4K Mixed 13.3 44% 14.2 MB/s	DQ Read 100 DQ Write 82.9 DQ Mixed 83.7 65% 89 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 23% Great: 110%
JetFlash Transcend 256GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 170GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.6 3.2 3.4 3.4 5.7 26 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	22.2% Poor	Read 31.1 Write 0.7 Mixed 24.9 SusWrite 8.4 19% 16.3 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 3.5 298% 3.9 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 22.2% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown AS8F8G73F-DJ2 1x2GB 1 of 4 slots used 2GB DIMM SDRAM 4915 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	12.5% Very poor	MC Read 4.5 MC Write 5 MC Mixed 3 12% 4.17 GB/s	SC Read 0.9 SC Write 3.3 SC Mixed 1.8 6% 2 GB/s	Latency 136 30% 136 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16