Asus P5K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics18.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive22.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P5K  (all builds)
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20071030
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 24 '22 at 17:57
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
22.2% Poor
Memory 29.4
1-Core 25.8
2-Core 39.4
20% 31.5 Pts
4-Core 87.9
8-Core 81.8
12% 84.9 Pts
64-Core 59.8
4% 59.8 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5870
AMD(1002 0B00) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
18.7% Very poor
Lighting 27.1
Reflection 20.1
Parallax 24.5
22% 23.9 fps
MRender 13.7
Gravity 21.1
Splatting 11.1
12% 15.3 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 73 77 76 96 82 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
22.4% Poor
Read 86.5
Write 136
Mixed 115
SusWrite 75.8
23% 103 MB/s
4K Read 8.5
4K Write 16.4
4K Mixed 14.5
40% 13.1 MB/s
DQ Read 29.7
DQ Write 32.1
DQ Mixed 33.1
24% 31.6 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 124%
Seagate Expansion Desk 10TB
7TB free
Firmware: 0915
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 19 21 22 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Read 29.6
Write 25.6
Mixed 23.8
SusWrite 19.8
18% 24.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 2.1
466% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 118%
USB DISK 3.0 32GB
26GB free, PID 5500
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 12 8.1 8.1 8.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
5.83% Terrible
Read 11.2
Write 17.1
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 10.3
15% 11 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
37% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 5.83%
Great: 40%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB-$9
13GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 22 23 23 24 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Read 25.8
Write 22.5
Mixed 13.4
SusWrite 22.6
28% 21.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.9
60% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
10.9% Very poor
MC Read 4.8
MC Write 3.4
MC Mixed 3.5
11% 3.9 GB/s
SC Read 2.5
SC Write 1.5
SC Mixed 1.9
6% 1.97 GB/s
Latency 258
16% 258 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5K Builds (Compare 357 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5K - $65

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $285
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback