MSI H310M PRO-M2 PLUS (MS-7C08)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 130% UFO	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 107% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	176% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

20 months ago, 20 months ago.

System	Micro-Star MS-7C08
Motherboard	MSI H310M PRO-M2 PLUS (MS-7C08) (all builds)
Memory	10.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190408
Uptime	14.6 Days
Run Date	Aug 24 '22 at 21:32
Run Duration	176 Seconds
Run User	CRI-User
Background CPU	23%

Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	77.1% Very good	Memory 78.2 1-Core 113 2-Core 222 77% 138 Pts	4-Core 414 8-Core 567 62% 491 Pts	64-Core 567 35% 567 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 77.1% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$625 424,051 User benchmarks, average bench 187% Zotac(19DA 1612) CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 512.95 Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	176% Outstanding	Lighting 252 Reflection 224 Parallax 253 205% 243 fps	MRender 295 Gravity 214 Splatting 161 176% 223 fps
Poor: 163% ↑ This bench: 176% Great: 202%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Team TM8FP6512G 512GB 6,771 User benchmarks, average bench 195% 17GB free (System drive) Firmware: EDFM00E2 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 558 Write 423 Mixed 398 102% 460 MB/s	4K Read 27.3 4K Write 93.4 4K Mixed 33.8 134% 51.5 MB/s	DQ Read 808 DQ Write 371 DQ Mixed 76.2 193% 419 MB/s
Poor: 119% Great: 270%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 242GB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 132 135 141 147 147 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	87.6% Excellent	Read 167 Write 165 Mixed 28.1 SusWrite 139 90% 125 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.6 144% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 87.6% Great: 108%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 30GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 114 116 117 151 125 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	66.6% Good	Read 109 Write 109 Mixed 70.6 SusWrite 122 76% 103 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.1 214% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 66.6% Great: 101%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 2x16GB 2,267 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	61.6% Good	MC Read 23.4 MC Write 23.3 MC Mixed 20.4 64% 22.4 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 20.3 SC Mixed 14.6 46% 16 GB/s	Latency 84 48% 84 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 61.6% Great: 102%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H310M PRO-M2 PLUS (MS-7C08) Builds (Compare 3,830 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 76%

Battleship

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 62%

Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI H310M PRO-M2 PLUS (MS-7C08)

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	1,531x
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	508x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	417x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	490x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	396x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	300x

SSD
SSDPEKNW256G8 256GBIntelBench 119%, 1,046 samples	157x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	111x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $52Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	86x

RAM
M378A1K43CB2-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 43%, 19,029 samples	337x
M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 80%, 29,586 samples	211x
CM4X8GD3000C16K4D 2x8GBCorsairBench 82%, 12,037 samples	122x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $426

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16