Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JA_X515JA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.34% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive194% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JA_X515JA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X515JA
Memory0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210602
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 25 '22 at 02:13
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1005G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64.1% Good
Memory 78.9
1-Core 116
2-Core 200
75% 132 Pts
4-Core 287
8-Core 284
38% 285 Pts
64-Core 286
18% 286 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
Asus(1043 14F2) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
5.34% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 3.8
Parallax 7.8
6% 6.17 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 6.9
Splatting 8.3
5% 5.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.34%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SM2P32A8-256GC1 256GB
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VC0S0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1088 1246 1428 482 42 55 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
194% Outstanding
Read 1,333
Write 1,447
Mixed 1,183
SusWrite 724
264% 1,172 MB/s
4K Read 47.4
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 68.7
231% 83.8 MB/s
DQ Read 394
DQ Write 723
DQ Mixed 476
384% 531 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 194%
Great: 213%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AD4S3200J4G22-BHYD 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
45.2% Average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 12.5
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 13.9
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 82.7
48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JA_X515JA Builds (Compare 730 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JA_X515JA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $67
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback