PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 28.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 38.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-H61M-DS2 3.0 (all builds) |
Memory | 12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20121012 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Sep 01 '22 at 05:08 |
Run Duration | 234 Seconds |
Run User | CRI-User |
Background CPU | 100% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Pentium G2020-$92
Intel(R) Pentium(R) CPU G2020 @ 2.90GHz, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
|
48.5%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Zotac(19DA A454) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.7%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Biostar S100-120GB 120GB
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 63 67 69 65 68 MB/s
|
38.2%
Below average
|
|||
Toshiba MK2546GSX_200 200GB
147GB free
Firmware: LB012Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 4.7 4.5 4.1 4.3 3.3 MB/s
|
8.11%
Terrible
|
|||
Samsung HD160JJ 160GB-$85
110GB free
Firmware: ZM100-47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 54 54 53 53 53 MB/s
|
30.8%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
48.2%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 108x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 75x |
Core i3-3220Intel $79Bench 52%, 71,790 samples | 70x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 136x |
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 39x |
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 37x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $87 |