Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire Z5100

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics12.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire Z5100  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer WMCP78M
Memory9.8 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110607
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateSep 04 '22 at 18:06
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 640-$70
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
35.5% Below average
Memory 51.3
1-Core 41
2-Core 77.3
35% 56.5 Pts
4-Core 112
8-Core 134
16% 123 Pts
64-Core 142
9% 142 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K1200
Nvidia(10DE 1140) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1032 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.48
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Lighting 14.7
Reflection 13.6
Parallax 13.5
12% 13.9 fps
MRender 19
Gravity 15
Splatting 14.4
13% 16.1 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$32
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX1G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 30 38 23 40 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Read 26.2
Write 57.6
Mixed 22.1
SusWrite 30.9
25% 34.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
94% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 62%
Hitachi HUS724020ALA640 2TB
52GB free
Firmware: MF6O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 61 54 67 56 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 116
Write 85.5
Mixed 65.7
SusWrite 60.7
60% 81.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.5
132% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$35
24GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 71 67 73 68 71 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
48.2% Average
Read 97.9
Write 84.9
Mixed 50.3
SusWrite 70
56% 75.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1
162% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PSD34G13332 Kingston ACR256X64D3U1333C9 Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 14GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.8% Poor
MC Read 11.7
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 7
24% 8.47 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 6.6
17% 5.93 GB/s
Latency 156
26% 156 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire Z5100 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Acer Aspire Z5100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback