Today's hottest deals

HP EliteBook 8560w

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.26% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP EliteBook 8560w  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1631
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600x900x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130715
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateSep 10 '22 at 14:32
Run Duration231 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2860QM-$469
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
67.4% Good
Memory 85.2
1-Core 87.7
2-Core 141
64% 105 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 369
41% 321 Pts
64-Core 343
21% 343 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000M
HP(103C 1631) 2GB
CLim: 550 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 353.62
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
5.26% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 8.1
Parallax 6.1
5% 6.8 fps
MRender 7.8
Gravity 7.2
Splatting 6.1
6% 7.03 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.26%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK5061GSYN 500GB-$75
425GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MH000C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 54 79 82 90 86 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 78.9
Write 86.5
Mixed 56
SusWrite 74.7
55% 74 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 56%
Lacie P9223 1TB
198GB free
Firmware: 1053
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 27 27 28 28 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Read 22.4
Write 16
Mixed 9.3
SusWrite 25.3
13% 18.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.4
86% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
48.6% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 15.7
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 16.2
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 8560w Builds (Compare 491 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8560w

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $255
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback