Dell Precision Tower 7810

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 108%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive57.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Precision Tower 7810
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 7810  (all builds)
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201019
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 29 '22 at 13:56
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
61.6% Good
Memory 67.3
1-Core 76.7
2-Core 166
59% 103 Pts
4-Core 300
8-Core 597
53% 448 Pts
64-Core 2,328
144% 2,328 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
Nvidia(10DE 12A6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 517.48
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
125% Outstanding
Lighting 167
Reflection 173
Parallax 170
136% 170 fps
MRender 184
Gravity 152
Splatting 126
123% 154 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 125%
Great: 134%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 90 165 230 226 245 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 348
Write 92.1
Mixed 135
SusWrite 174
41% 187 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 48.4
4K Mixed 22.5
83% 29.9 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 91.3
DQ Mixed 118
99% 147 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 9ASF51272PZ-2G1B1 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB RIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
118% Outstanding
MC Read 55.4
MC Write 42.1
MC Mixed 46.9
138% 48.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 16.3
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 118%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision Tower 7810 Builds (Compare 1,754 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 7810

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 31% - Below average Total price: $66
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback