PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 27.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 31.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus M5A78L-M/USB3 (all builds) |
Memory | 25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20141202 |
Uptime | 4.4 Days |
Run Date | Oct 03 '22 at 18:57 |
Run Duration | 161 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 42% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
64.7%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 517.48
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
27.2%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
PNY CS900 240GB-$25
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900612
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 107 70 16 43 59 MB/s
|
31.4%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$45
332GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 112 109 112 112 112 MB/s
|
68.9%
Good
|
|||
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 14 14 MB/s
|
11.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Asmedia ASMT1153e 8TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
|
11.6%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
46.1%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 513x |
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 326x |
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 186x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples | 139x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 127x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 91x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $171 |