Asus G11CD-K

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	27.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	61.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

18 months ago, 17 months ago.

System	Asus G11CD-K (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK G11CD-K
Memory	26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161125
Uptime	2.6 Days
Run Date	Nov 04 '22 at 11:30
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	47%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7500-$89 149,467 User benchmarks, average bench 67% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	59.1% Above average	Memory 72.3 1-Core 102 2-Core 187 68% 120 Pts	4-Core 260 8-Core 298 36% 279 Pts	64-Core 280 17% 280 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 59.1% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3763) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.15 Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	27.4% Poor	Lighting 35 Reflection 37.7 Parallax 35.6 28% 36.1 fps	MRender 31.7 Gravity 36.5 Splatting 25.8 25% 31.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 132GB free (System drive) Firmware: S3500105 SusWrite @10s intervals: 277 175 157 73 123 78 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	61.9% Good	Read 413 Write 310 Mixed 336 SusWrite 147 67% 302 MB/s	4K Read 18.4 4K Write 47.8 4K Mixed 20.4 79% 28.9 MB/s	DQ Read 243 DQ Write 308 DQ Mixed 94.1 122% 215 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 451GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 126 125 126 127 127 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	70.4% Very good	Read 119 Write 122 Mixed 83.7 SusWrite 126 83% 113 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.1 208% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT16G4DFD824A.C16FBD Hynix HMA82GU6AFR8N-UH 32GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2400, 2400 MHz 16384, 16384 MB Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	62.1% Good	MC Read 18.9 MC Write 24.9 MC Mixed 21.1 62% 21.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.8 SC Write 28.5 SC Mixed 20.9 61% 21.4 GB/s	Latency 96.2 42% 96.2 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical G11CD-K Builds (Compare 1,744 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 20%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

System: Asus G11CD-K

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $90Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	919x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	729x
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	30x

GPU
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	456x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	298x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	237x

SSD
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK256TBN 256GBBench 78%, 6,868 samples	146x
HFS128G32TND-N210A 128GBBench 63%, 4,377 samples	141x
SD8SBAT128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 58%, 3,654 samples	115x

RAM
HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 39%, 21,551 samples	173x
HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 74%, 20,415 samples	163x
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 39%, 22,600 samples	125x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $192

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $490	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16