Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Raft	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 30% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	28.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	164% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

18 months ago, 18 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	4.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200401
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 15 '22 at 02:14
Run Duration	164 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	9%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$200 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	84.1% Excellent	Memory 70.1 1-Core 136 2-Core 272 85% 160 Pts	4-Core 526 8-Core 865 85% 695 Pts	64-Core 1,409 87% 1,409 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 84.1% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 8C96) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28.2% Poor	Lighting 35.5 Reflection 40 Parallax 37.2 29% 37.6 fps	MRender 36.6 Gravity 37.9 Splatting 26.7 27% 33.7 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.2% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZSLW1T0HMLH-000L1 1TB 587 User benchmarks, average bench 168% 240GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3L0QCXY7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 465 408 398 358 371 378 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	164% Outstanding	Read 1,369 Write 466 Mixed 398 SusWrite 396 144% 657 MB/s	4K Read 29.6 4K Write 128 4K Mixed 44.1 169% 67.3 MB/s	DQ Read 1048 DQ Write 439 DQ Mixed 518 444% 669 MB/s
Poor: 99% ↑ This bench: 164% Great: 241%
Samsung MZSLW1T0HMLH-000L1 1TB 587 User benchmarks, average bench 168% 85GB free Firmware: 3L0QCXY7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 502 493 482 403 254 233 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	164% Outstanding	Read 1,271 Write 499 Mixed 545 SusWrite 395 149% 677 MB/s	4K Read 33.6 4K Write 123 4K Mixed 45.3 174% 67.2 MB/s	DQ Read 1,138 DQ Write 463 DQ Mixed 586 490% 729 MB/s
Poor: 99% ↑ This bench: 164% Great: 241%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 114GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 290 290 289 292 294 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 488 Write 443 Mixed 392 SusWrite 308 92% 408 MB/s	4K Read 42.5 4K Write 88.1 4K Mixed 55 182% 61.9 MB/s	DQ Read 214 DQ Write 183 DQ Mixed 199 149% 199 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 124%
Toshiba MG05ACA800EY 8TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 757GB free Firmware: GZ0D SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 139 142 142 141 138 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	80.8% Excellent	Read 140 Write 142 Mixed 73.7 SusWrite 140 91% 124 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 6.5 4K Mixed 0.7 240% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 80.8% Great: 130%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$56 346,786 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	64.9% Good	MC Read 26.5 MC Write 17.9 MC Mixed 25.2 66% 23.2 GB/s	SC Read 18.9 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 24.4 58% 20.3 GB/s	Latency 101 40% 101 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 64.9% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,941 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $25

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $200Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,661x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $170Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,294x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $110Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,429x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,248x
RTX 3080Nvidia $899Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,084x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,473x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $86Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,841x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $106Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,107x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $152Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	868x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	773x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	729x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $112Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	646x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $850

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16