Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 17.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	25.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (86%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-5200U 107,407 User benchmarks, average bench 42% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	17.1% Very poor	Memory 18.3 1-Core 31.4 2-Core 78.5 22% 42.7 Pts	4-Core 89.5 8-Core 108 13% 98.9 Pts	64-Core 113 7% 113 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 17.1% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 199GB free (System drive) Firmware: S3H01103 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 118 95 124 124 139 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	25.7% Poor	Read 120 Write 120 Mixed 112 SusWrite 121 27% 118 MB/s	4K Read 5.9 4K Write 15.7 4K Mixed 4.6 23% 8.73 MB/s	DQ Read 118 DQ Write 182 DQ Mixed 87.2 84% 129 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 25.7% Great: 100%
Hitachi HTE543232A7A384 320GB 52 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 297GB free Firmware: ES2OA70B SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 72 62 73 74 78 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	37.6% Below average	Read 59.6 Write 65.1 Mixed 39.4 SusWrite 71.3 43% 58.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.5 88% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 37.6% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905428-417.A00LF 99U5428-018.A00LF 16GB 39 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	30.1% Below average	MC Read 12.1 MC Write 14 MC Mixed 10.4 35% 12.2 GB/s	SC Read 3.7 SC Write 4.2 SC Mixed 3.4 11% 3.77 GB/s	Latency 334 12% 334 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 58%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	107x
HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 275,372 samples	25x
HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 43,454 samples	8x

RAM
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 64,960 samples	23x
ACR16D3LS1KNG/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 23%, 5,526 samples	18x
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples	15x

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16