Acer Predator PO3-600

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics42.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Predator PO3-600  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Predator PO3-600
Memory6.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190116
Uptime4.2 Days
Run DateNov 23 '22 at 21:25
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 48%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Memory 78.6
1-Core 111
2-Core 215
76% 135 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 451
53% 411 Pts
64-Core 560
35% 560 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Sapphire(174B 2438) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 526.98
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.4% Average
Lighting 53.3
Reflection 53.9
Parallax 50.4
43% 52.5 fps
MRender 49
Gravity 50.7
Splatting 48.9
40% 49.5 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Emtec X300 128GB
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFMB0.5
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 946
Write 491
Mixed 64.9
108% 501 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 21.5
4K Mixed 10.7
30% 11.8 MB/s
DQ Read 364
DQ Write 488
DQ Mixed 186
207% 346 MB/s
Poor: 84% Great: 181%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$28
218GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 175 177 169 178 180 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 179
Write 179
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 176
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 102%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43DB2-CTD 075D IRX2666D464L16S/8G 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.7% Above average
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 18.8
57% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 16.1
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 83.2
48% 83.2 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator PO3-600 Builds (Compare 2,676 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship

System: Acer Predator PO3-600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $506
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback