Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	41.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	79.9% Very good	Memory 84.3 1-Core 86.1 2-Core 231 74% 134 Pts	4-Core 407 8-Core 598 63% 502 Pts	64-Core 637 39% 637 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 79.9% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Sapphire(174B A548) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 2009 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 535.98 Performing below potential (48^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	41.7% Average	Lighting 54.2 Reflection 56.1 Parallax 47.6 44% 52.6 fps	MRender 41.2 Gravity 48.3 Splatting 45.2 37% 44.9 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 41.7% Great: 46%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1 512GB 5,630 User benchmarks, average bench 126% 155GB free (System drive) Firmware: E8FK12.3 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 659 Write 563 Mixed 510 128% 577 MB/s	4K Read 21.5 4K Write 48.3 4K Mixed 25.6 91% 31.8 MB/s	DQ Read 816 DQ Write 544 DQ Mixed 521 432% 627 MB/s
Poor: 82% Great: 157%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 7,128 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1.5TB free, PID 0900 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 126 Write 101 Mixed 19.9 93% 82.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.6 43% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43DB2-CTD 075D IRX2666D464L16S/8G 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	70.9% Very good	MC Read 26.7 MC Write 27.7 MC Mixed 21.1 72% 25.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 26.9 SC Mixed 21.6 60% 21.1 GB/s	Latency 72.9 55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 71%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 86%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 78%

Battleship

SSD
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1014 512GBWDCBench 168%, 18,999 samples	520x
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1 256GBKingstonBench 100%, 13,793 samples	325x
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBBench 121%, 26,870 samples	168x

RAM
M378A1K43DB2-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 79%, 6,043 samples	500x
HMA81GU6CJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 80%, 9,970 samples	319x
ACR26D4U9S8ME-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 78%, 1,446 samples	199x

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $506