Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics26.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (77%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH 990FX  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121016
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateNov 29 '22 at 02:07
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 77%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8120
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
46.8% Average
Memory 68.7
1-Core 44.2
2-Core 85.3
43% 66.1 Pts
4-Core 139
8-Core 187
21% 163 Pts
64-Core 165
10% 165 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
Zotac(19DA 1255) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.98
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.6% Poor
Lighting 29.6
Reflection 13.9
Parallax 36.9
24% 26.8 fps
MRender 43.4
Gravity 40
Splatting 33.9
32% 39.1 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ VERTEX3 60GB
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.15
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 282
Write 67.9
Mixed 116
34% 155 MB/s
4K Read 14.9
4K Write 30.4
4K Mixed 22.1
67% 22.5 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 70
DQ Mixed 84.9
64% 87.2 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 70%
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$20
23GB free
Firmware: 02.03E02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 58 59 56 57 57 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Read 68
Write 68.5
Mixed 48.9
SusWrite 55.7
44% 60.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 55%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 124GB
49GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 14 14 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
Read 100
Write 14.2
Mixed 9.2
SusWrite 12.9
31% 34.2 MB/s
4K Read 10.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
38% 3.4 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 39%
ST4000DM 000-1F2168 2TB
3.5TB free, PID 0c15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 5.7 5.3 5.4 4.9 7.8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.1% Very poor
Read 50.9
Write 34.1
Mixed 29.3
SusWrite 6.8
37% 30.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
76% 1.1 MB/s
ST310003 40AS 1TB
634GB free, PID 0c15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.6 0.7 0.4 0.6 0.2 5.6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
10.8% Very poor
Read 50.9
Write 33.3
Mixed 26.6
SusWrite 1.5
33% 28.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
62% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 19%
WDC WD10 EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
60GB free, PID 0c15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
8.7% Terrible
Read 32.8
Write 33.9
Mixed 23.4
SusWrite 0.2
28% 22.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
71% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.7%
Great: 17%
ST310003 40AS 1TB
931GB free, PID 0c15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 31 33 32 32 33 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 349
Write 4
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 30.5
74% 97.6 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Mixed 0
117% 10.5 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
31.7% Below average
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 11.6
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 8
20% 6.87 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH 990FX Builds (Compare 423 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $522
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback