Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B450M-PRO II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics39.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B450M-PRO II  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220428
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 02 '22 at 01:20
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Memory 79.8
1-Core 163
2-Core 326
101% 190 Pts
4-Core 520
8-Core 839
83% 680 Pts
64-Core 1,089
67% 1,089 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-2048SP
AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1284 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.10.3
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
39.9% Below average
Lighting 47.6
Reflection 58.6
Parallax 66.1
39% 57.4 fps
MRender 59
Gravity 54.4
Splatting 43.9
42% 52.4 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03070103
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 450
Write 303
Mixed 158
67% 304 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 48
4K Mixed 6.9
66% 25.3 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 99.3
DQ Mixed 66.1
64% 103 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 100%
SSD 256GB 256GB
56GB free
Firmware: T0703A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 392 121 70 75 74 75 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Read 458
Write 423
Mixed 350
SusWrite 134
76% 341 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 88.3
4K Mixed 28.8
131% 49.4 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 48.3
95% 186 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 166%
WD WD3200AVVS-63L2B0 320GB
5GB free
Firmware: 01.03A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 69 68 70 71 69 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
38.9% Below average
Read 66.3
Write 64.3
Mixed 43.1
SusWrite 68.9
45% 60.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 43%
WD GB External 64GB
6GB free, PID 1010
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 38 39 39 39 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.5% Average
Read 33.3
Write 33
Mixed 33.7
SusWrite 38.3
48% 34.6 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 9.7
4K Mixed 11.5
792% 13.4 MB/s
DQ Read 12.7
DQ Write 18
DQ Mixed 14.3
1,146% 15 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Asgard VMA45UG-MEC1U2AW2 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 41.6
MC Write 42.8
MC Mixed 34.5
113% 39.6 GB/s
SC Read 24.6
SC Write 40.4
SC Mixed 32.3
93% 32.4 GB/s
Latency 80.8
50% 80.8 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 108%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B450M-PRO II Builds (Compare 893 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B450M-PRO II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $229
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback