Asus RAMPAGE IV BLACK EDITION

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics26.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE IV BLACK EDITION  (all builds)
Memory28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140704
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 10 '17 at 23:50
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4820K-$110
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
52.8% Above average
Memory 64.4
1-Core 26.5
2-Core 78.7
36% 56.5 Pts
4-Core 222
8-Core 392
37% 307 Pts
64-Core 370
23% 370 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
Asus(1043 3006) 3GB
CLim: 1070 MHz, MLim: 1600 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.2.1
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.8% Poor
Lighting 28.1
Reflection 34.1
Parallax 63.9
23% 42.1 fps
MRender 32.7
Gravity 50.1
Splatting 42.5
34% 41.8 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ REVODRIVE3 480GB
299GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
54% Above average
Read 407
Write 324
Mixed 279
75% 337 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 31.3
4K Mixed 7.5
49% 17.9 MB/s
DQ Read 90.3
DQ Write 82.9
DQ Mixed 45.5
45% 72.9 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 54%
Great: 90%
Innostor Innostor 32GB
1GB free, PID 0917
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
24.8% Poor
Read 116
Write 25.5
Mixed 33.5
57% 58.3 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 0.33
4K Mixed 0.34
45% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
67.6% Good
MC Read 23.8
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 29.1
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 5.1
23% 7.97 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE IV BLACK EDITION Builds (Compare 686 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE IV BLACK EDITION

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $577
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback