Today's hottest deals

Asus H110M-R

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics26% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive96% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H110M-R  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 23 '22 at 01:56
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7100-$35
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
61% Good
Memory 79
1-Core 99.6
2-Core 178
69% 119 Pts
4-Core 248
8-Core 267
34% 257 Pts
64-Core 268
17% 268 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 61%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$91
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 526.47
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26% Poor
Lighting 32.7
Reflection 40.2
Parallax 35.8
27% 36.2 fps
MRender 37.2
Gravity 33.7
Splatting 23
25% 31.3 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKT1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 369 399 419 436 446 437 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
96% Outstanding
Read 404
Write 409
Mixed 321
SusWrite 418
87% 388 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 84.6
4K Mixed 33.1
137% 50.2 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 180
166% 252 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 96%
Great: 100%
WD Green 120GB (2016)-$84
22GB free
Firmware: Z3311000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 61 51 67 51 48 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Read 352
Write 69
Mixed 125
SusWrite 60.7
33% 152 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 84.3
4K Mixed 17.5
98% 40.7 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 87.8
DQ Mixed 28.8
45% 88.2 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 71%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
317GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 83 70 30 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 126
Write 125
Mixed 80.5
SusWrite 51.7
71% 95.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
223% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KS3200D4P12016G 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.2% Below average
MC Read 12.7
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 10.1
33% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 7.5
23% 7.97 GB/s
Latency 82.5
48% 82.5 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-R Builds (Compare 3,754 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-R

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $154
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $393
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback