Today's hottest deals

Asus Pro WS X570-ACE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive53.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (85%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Pro WS X570-ACE  (all builds)
Memory22.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210305
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 25 '22 at 11:28
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 85%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
64.6% Good
Memory 64
1-Core 104
2-Core 192
67% 120 Pts
4-Core 351
8-Core 580
57% 465 Pts
64-Core 1,013
63% 1,013 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 92%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
AXNS381E-256GM-B 256GB
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 263j-HP
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 201 185 194 194 194 MB/s
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.7% Above average
Read 278
Write 206
Mixed 187
SusWrite 193
48% 216 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 41.2
4K Mixed 18.3
67% 24.6 MB/s
DQ Read 239
DQ Write 220
DQ Mixed 105
113% 188 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 85%
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
128GB free
Firmware: SBFKJ1A3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 335 322 321 324 330 321 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 301
Write 296
Mixed 290
SusWrite 325
68% 303 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 35.9
4K Mixed 20.7
73% 24.9 MB/s
DQ Read 185
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 157
126% 177 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 100%
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
2GB free
Firmware: 03090004
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 362
Write 284
Mixed 250
66% 299 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 31.9
4K Mixed 21.1
70% 23.4 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 127
DQ Mixed 115
92% 130 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 85%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 1TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 75 112 75 111 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 91.3
Write 29.3
Mixed 43
SusWrite 95.8
48% 64.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
139% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
MC Read 36.1
MC Write 23.3
MC Mixed 36.3
91% 31.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 18.3
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pro WS X570-ACE Builds (Compare 367 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 183%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 209%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus Pro WS X570-ACE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Average Total price: $1,833
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback