PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 35.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Dell PowerEdge T320 |
Motherboard | Dell PowerEdge T320 (all builds) |
Memory | 2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | Цвета: 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit, Цвета: 1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20140710 |
Uptime | 0.3 Days |
Run Date | Dec 27 '22 at 17:42 |
Run Duration | 139 Seconds |
Run User | RUS-User |
Background CPU | 36% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Intel Xeon E5-2470 v2
CPU1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
|
33.2%
Below average
|
36% 67.8 Pts
|
35% 292 Pts
|
50% 802 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() AMD R9 280X-$500
XFX(1682 3001) 3GB
CLim: 1080 MHz, MLim: 1550 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
35.7%
Below average
|
39% 48.6 fps
|
29% 36.6 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() WD RE4 500GB (2010)-$30
197GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1S05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 84 52 60 89 87 MB/s
|
57%
Above average
|
70% 95.1 MB/s
|
214% 1.57 MB/s
|
|
![]() Wd0163abyx-23 39M4507 42C0462IBM 160GB
139GB free
Firmware: WC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 122 124 122 123 122 MB/s
|
70.2%
Very good
|
83% 112 MB/s
|
209% 1.6 MB/s
|
|
![]() WD RE4 500GB (2010)-$30
300GB free
Firmware: 1S05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 113 115 114 113 113 MB/s
|
58.5%
Above average
|
66% 89.3 MB/s
|
203% 1.53 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Hynix HMT41GR7AFR4A-PB 1x8GB
1 of 6 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
16.6%
Very poor
|
19% 6.53 GB/s
|
5% 1.7 GB/s
|
15% 269 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Xeon E5-2470 v2IntelBench 63%, 279 samples | 20x |
Xeon E5-2420 0IntelBench 58%, 1,039 samples | 12x |
Xeon E5-2420 v2IntelBench 62%, 669 samples | 9x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 6x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 5x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $269Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 5x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
MX100 256GBCrucial $116Bench 83%, 55,768 samples | 5x |
CS900 500GB SSDPNYBench 75%, 16,267 samples | 4x |
PERC H310 255GBDellBench 64%, 288 samples | 2x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $233 |