Today's hottest deals

Alaska A_M_I_

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive40.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAlaska A_M_I_  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220811
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 30 '22 at 16:44
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10810U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
74.2% Very good
Memory 76.3
1-Core 127
2-Core 215
79% 139 Pts
4-Core 388
8-Core 577
60% 482 Pts
64-Core 680
42% 680 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
6.1% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 6
Parallax 6.6
4% 6 fps
MRender 12.9
Gravity 8.6
Splatting 12.6
9% 11.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.1%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
FPT310M8SSD512G 512GB
422GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HAFEB2.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 309 355 392 405 402 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
40.7% Average
Read 138
Write 82.9
Mixed 73.8
SusWrite 373
38% 167 MB/s
4K Read 12.5
4K Write 16.6
4K Mixed 8.7
39% 12.6 MB/s
DQ Read 15.2
DQ Write 16.2
DQ Mixed 14.8
11% 15.4 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NS08GS4E8 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.2% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 15.2
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 16.4
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 87.6
46% 87.6 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A_M_I_ Builds (Compare 617 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Alaska A_M_I_

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback