Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VII HERO (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 122%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 118%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics145% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG CROSSHAIR VII HERO (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210913
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 01 '23 at 18:29
Run Duration316 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Memory 78.2
1-Core 124
2-Core 246
82% 150 Pts
4-Core 483
8-Core 801
78% 642 Pts
64-Core 1175
73% 1175 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6800-$759
ASRock(1849 5204) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
145% Outstanding
Lighting 176
Reflection 168
Parallax 387
143% 243 fps
MRender 286
Gravity 133
Splatting 240
181% 220 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 145%
Great: 153%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 1TB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 2,087
Write 1,765
Mixed 1,462
394% 1,771 MB/s
4K Read 49
4K Write 86
4K Mixed 58.5
195% 64.5 MB/s
DQ Read 823
DQ Write 554
DQ Mixed 637
489% 671 MB/s
Samsung 970 500GB
286GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1788 873 577 580 582 585 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
102GB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 351 151 151 151 151 152 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Read 475
Write 448
Mixed 390
SusWrite 185
84% 374 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 59.7
4K Mixed 41.5
137% 45.3 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 355
DQ Mixed 353
268% 362 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 115%
Amd-raid WDC WD6003FFBX-6 6TB
1TB free
Firmware: 83.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 152 152 155 149 148 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 159
Mixed 58.7
SusWrite 152
99% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 6.5
4K Mixed 0.4
219% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 146%
Maxtor STM325082 250GB
196GB free
Firmware: 3.AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 58 57 58 60 60 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 111
Write 21.4
Mixed 41.3
SusWrite 58.3
43% 58.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 49%
WD Elements 107C 4TB
924GB free, PID 107c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 85 84 83 84 83 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 125
Write 117
Mixed 83.3
SusWrite 83.7
135% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
125% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 60%
Samsung G3 Station 1TB
258GB free, PID 6012
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 19 19 19 19 20 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Read 62.6
Write 22
Mixed 36.3
SusWrite 19.4
42% 35.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
69% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 20%
WD Elements 1.5TB
1TB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Read 51.6
Write 34.2
Mixed 27.6
SusWrite 17.8
40% 32.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
69% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C14-8GFX 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
83.6% Excellent
MC Read 31.7
MC Write 29.8
MC Mixed 27.4
85% 29.6 GB/s
SC Read 24.8
SC Write 31.5
SC Mixed 27
79% 27.8 GB/s
Latency 83.9
48% 83.9 ns
Poor: 81%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG CROSSHAIR VII HERO (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 926 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VII HERO (WI-FI) - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $1,023
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback