Asus B85M-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	26.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus B85M-E (all builds)
Memory	4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130418
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 08 '19 at 18:21
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	32%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4570-$99 129,272 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	69.2% Good	Memory 89.5 1-Core 76.8 2-Core 142 63% 103 Pts	4-Core 276 8-Core 329 39% 303 Pts	64-Core 363 22% 363 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199 77,943 User benchmarks, average bench 27% Sapphire(174B E271) Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 14.100.0.0 Performing below potential (70^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	26.9% Poor	Lighting 33.3 Reflection 31.1 Parallax 44.9 27% 36.4 fps	MRender 27.5 Gravity 30.9 Splatting 36.8 27% 31.7 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 26.9% Great: 29%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Maxtor STM325082 250GB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 141GB free Firmware: J SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 43 42 43 43 43 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	26.4% Poor	Read 49 Write 20.3 Mixed 35.8 SusWrite 42.8 28% 37 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 26.4% Great: 49%
Seagate ST3250820SV 250GB 245 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 159GB free Firmware: H SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 77 75 77 78 78 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	42.8% Average	Read 71.8 Write 70.8 Mixed 42.8 SusWrite 77.1 48% 65.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 44%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 320GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1H15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 115 128 138 147 140 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	60.3% Good	Read 79 Write 91.8 Mixed 68 SusWrite 131 68% 92.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.4 99% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB 47,852 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	57.6% Above average	MC Read 20.9 MC Write 22.2 MC Mixed 18.4 59% 20.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.9 SC Write 16.4 SC Mixed 14.7 42% 14.7 GB/s	Latency 67.9 59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B85M-E Builds (Compare 2,962 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B85M-E - $106

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	399x
Core i7-4790Intel $132Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	324x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	260x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	330x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	202x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	177x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	97x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	93x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	81x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	54x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	37x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	31x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $343

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353