Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive236% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemQEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory58.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 04 '23 at 17:36
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Memory 68.9
1-Core 73.4
2-Core 195
62% 112 Pts
4-Core 391
8-Core 742
67% 567 Pts
64-Core 1,490
92% 1,490 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Nvidia(10DE 2489) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
127% Outstanding
Lighting 177
Reflection 170
Parallax 162
144% 170 fps
MRender 184
Gravity 130
Splatting 112
113% 142 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 127%
Great: 136%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Samsung SSD 970 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1651 1648 1650 1650 1643 1671 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
236% Outstanding
Read 1,760
Write 1,726
Mixed 1,645
SusWrite 1,652
382% 1,696 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 61.4
4K Mixed 47.1
149% 48.5 MB/s
DQ Read 454
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 394
297% 399 MB/s
Poor: 221%
This bench: 236%
Great: 431%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM RAM
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
78.3% Very good
MC Read 33.5
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 30.5
86% 30.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 13.9
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 223%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Builds (Compare 99 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

System: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 124% - Outstanding Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback