Asus Crosshair IV Formula

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics	37% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	49.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

9 years ago, 9 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus Crosshair IV Formula (all builds)
Memory	5.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110401
Uptime	5 Days
Run Date	Sep 13 '14 at 04:25
Run Duration	278 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T-$340 12,769 User benchmarks, average bench 59% AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 64.3 2-Core 127 44% 95.6 Pts	4-Core 243 8-Core 360 38% 302 Pts	64-Core 354 22% 354 Pts
Poor: 51% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279 116,895 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Gigabyte(1458 360C) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4052 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	37% Below average	Lighting 45.9 Reflection 41.8 Parallax 53.9 37% 47.2 fps	MRender 56.8 Gravity 40.1 Splatting 39 36% 45.3 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42 25,948 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 68GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.25 Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	49.6% Average	Read 336 Write 118 Mixed 164 45% 206 MB/s	4K Read 25.3 4K Write 76.9 4K Mixed 10.9 93% 37.7 MB/s	DQ Read 24.6 DQ Write 86.2 DQ Mixed 9.65 21% 40.1 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 82%
Hitachi HTS547564A9E384 640GB 14,066 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 265GB free Firmware: JEDO Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	34.8% Below average	Read 62.3 Write 59.1 Mixed 57.6 45% 59.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 0.98 4K Mixed 0.14 51% 0.51 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 34.8% Great: 51%
AMD 3+0 Stripe/RAID0 477GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 73GB free Firmware: 1.10 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	122% Outstanding	Read 238 Write 188 Mixed 208 159% 211 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 5.15 4K Mixed 0.5 167% 2.01 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 122% Great: 122%
Generic External 160GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 149GB free, PID 1340 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	17.2% Very poor	Read 30.2 Write 30.2 Mixed 29.7 39% 30 MB/s	4K Read 0.66 4K Write 1.99 4K Mixed 0.38 83% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 17.2% Great: 20%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA332 1TB 167 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 111GB free, PID 0577 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	14.5% Very poor	Read 29.6 Write 29.4 Mixed 6.92 26% 22 MB/s	4K Read 0.32 4K Write 1.22 4K Mixed 0.2 50% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 14.5% Great: 19%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Crosshair IV Formula Builds (Compare 281 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 25%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV Formula

CPU
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	120x
Phenom II X6 1100TAMD $340Bench 59%, 12,769 samples	35x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	31x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	15x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	12x
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples	10x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	18x
INTENSO 240GBBench 77%, 887 samples	8x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	7x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	8x
F3-16000CL9-2GBRH F3-16000CL9-2GBRH F3-16000CL9-2GBRH F3-16000CL9-2GBRH 8GBUnknownBench 39%, 26 samples	5x
F3-10666CL9-4GBRL F3-10666CL9-4GBRL 8GBUnknownBench 44%, 282 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $516

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16