Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	8.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (78%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	2 GB free of 6 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit 色彩, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit 色彩
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140401
Uptime	3.9 Days
Run Date	Jan 10 '23 at 00:45
Run Duration	115 Seconds
Run User	TWN-User
Background CPU	78%

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3 11 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	24.7% Poor	Memory 16 1-Core 53.8 2-Core 98.6 29% 56.1 Pts	4-Core 179 8-Core 332 30% 255 Pts	64-Core 430 27% 430 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 24.7% Great: 76%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 161GB 39 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 107GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.5+ SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 25 25 26 24 22 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	8.6% Terrible	Read 162 Write 26.7 Mixed 29.6 SusWrite 24.7 13% 60.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.2 2% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 8.6% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x6GB 694 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 1 of 1 slots used 6GB DIMM RAM Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	38.7% Below average	MC Read 14.2 MC Write 17.1 MC Mixed 15 44% 15.4 GB/s	SC Read 4.9 SC Write 7.1 SC Mixed 7.4 18% 6.47 GB/s	Latency 352 11% 352 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 102%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 124%

UFO

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 127%

UFO

CPU
Gen Intel Core i7-12700K12thBench 99%, 67 samples	5x
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 24-CoreAMDBench 85%, 74 samples	4x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	4x

SSD
Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GBCorsairBench 230%, 32,020 samples	4x
SM841 mSATA 256GBSamsungBench 79%, 1,284 samples	3x
HARDDISK 86GBQemuBench 42%, 75 samples	3x

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16