Performance Results


Gaming 25% Surfboard	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	30.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	17.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (64%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700-$167 256,717 User benchmarks, average bench 76% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	63.4% Good	Memory 73.8 1-Core 85.8 2-Core 166 63% 108 Pts	4-Core 285 8-Core 572 50% 429 Pts	64-Core 483 30% 483 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 63.4% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 8598) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	30.5% Below average	Lighting 39.3 Reflection 28 Parallax 14.7 32% 27.3 fps	MRender 20.9 Gravity 27.6 Splatting 46.4 28% 31.6 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 26GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z32080RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 18 32 25 14 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	17.2% Very poor	Read 162 Write 133 Mixed 4.7 SusWrite 22.9 18% 80.7 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Write 32.4 4K Mixed 0.1 22% 11.9 MB/s	DQ Read 124 DQ Write 26.6 DQ Mixed 12.8 26% 54.6 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 17.2% Great: 86%
Samsung 860 Pro 2TB-$474 2,198 User benchmarks, average bench 111% 1TB free Firmware: RVM02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 358 379 366 379 396 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	90.8% Outstanding	Read 428 Write 403 Mixed 365 SusWrite 374 88% 393 MB/s	4K Read 28 4K Write 53.8 4K Mixed 32.1 112% 38 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 341 DQ Mixed 358 270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 84% ↑ This bench: 90.8% Great: 131%
WD WD10EURS-630AB1 1TB 3,395 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 144GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 53 53 55 53 54 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	32.5% Below average	Read 59.4 Write 54.9 Mixed 47.6 SusWrite 53.5 40% 53.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.5 96% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 32.5% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2A2400C14 029E CMK16GX4M2A2400C14 029E CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 029E CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 32GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	63.5% Good	MC Read 22.7 MC Write 25.9 MC Mixed 20.8 66% 23.1 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 23.4 SC Mixed 16.2 49% 17.1 GB/s	Latency 92.9 43% 92.9 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 63.5% Great: 80%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 47%

Yacht

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 40%

Speed boat

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	27x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $75Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	19x
Force LS 120GBCorsair $98Bench 54%, 9,315 samples	9x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $31Bench 71%, 98,777 samples	26x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	13x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 76%, 105,447 samples	9x

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $414

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16