Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics11.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive327% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI  (all builds)
Memory19.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220512
Uptime9.9 Days
Run DateFeb 06 '23 at 15:07
Run Duration306 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$241
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 77.5
1-Core 175
2-Core 349
105% 201 Pts
4-Core 682
8-Core 1,283
117% 983 Pts
64-Core 2,046
127% 2,046 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 103%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6850
Sapphire(174B E174) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Lighting 16.1
Reflection 18.8
Parallax 14.2
13% 16.4 fps
MRender 12.4
Gravity 11.7
Splatting 10.1
9% 11.4 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$60
829GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42B2S7JA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1510 902 905 902 922 922 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
327% Outstanding
Read 2,807
Write 2,115
Mixed 1,680
SusWrite 1,010
424% 1,903 MB/s
4K Read 66.8
4K Write 185
4K Mixed 93.6
319% 115 MB/s
DQ Read 1,396
DQ Write 1,048
DQ Mixed 719
674% 1,055 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 327%
Great: 372%
WDC WD40EFAX-68JH4N1 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 83.00A83
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 32,720
Mixed 43.2
3,392% 16,381 MB/s
4K Read 7
4K Write 8.7
4K Mixed 1.1
17% 5.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1.1
DQ Write 11.7
DQ Mixed 2.2
3% 5 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 38%
Team TM8PS7001T 1TB
2TB free
Firmware: S1127B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 409 398 400 400 399 402 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Read 493
Write 392
Mixed 361
SusWrite 401
92% 412 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 85.7
4K Mixed 25.5
121% 46.5 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 38.3
69% 136 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 104%
Adata Ultimate SU800 512GB-$71
477GB free
Firmware: 02K0S86G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 426 434 429 431 434 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 410
Mixed 410
SusWrite 430
98% 437 MB/s
4K Read 41.5
4K Write 88.9
4K Mixed 55.6
181% 62 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 136
120% 179 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 112%
Great: 127%
Amd-raid WDC WD40EFAX-68J 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 83.00A83
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 32,277
Mixed 63.3
11,554% 16,170 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
1,060% 8.2 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 110%
Toshiba MG07SCA12TA 12TB
7.5TB free
Firmware: 0105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 223 221 223 222 224 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
123% Outstanding
Read 207
Write 112
Mixed 98.9
SusWrite 222
117% 160 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 6.5
4K Mixed 1
256% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 123%
This bench: 123%
Great: 125%
WD My Passport 2627 5TB
749GB free, PID 2627
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 65 66 66 66 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
43.9% Average
Read 65.7
Write 59.1
Mixed 48
SusWrite 65
80% 59.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 6.5
4K Mixed 0.9
255% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 65%
WD Elements 107C 1TB
825GB free, PID 107c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 140 140 139 140 141 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 127
Write 138
Mixed 79.1
SusWrite 140
165% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
65% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3600C18-8GTZRX F4-3600C18-8GTZN F4-3600C18-8GTZRX F4-3600C18-8GTZN 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
86.2% Excellent
MC Read 43.7
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 25.4
92% 32.1 GB/s
SC Read 23
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 26.7
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 85.2
47% 85.2 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI Builds (Compare 6,700 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $813
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $158
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback