| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 16.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 76.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | HP Z840 Workstation (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 2129 |
| Memory | 12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20151119 |
| Uptime | 1.9 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 09 '23 at 01:07 |
| Run Duration | 125 Seconds |
| Run User | MYS-User |
| Background CPU | 7% |
PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
CPU0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
|
66.4%
Good
|
61% 102 Pts
|
49% 414 Pts
|
59% 956 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia Quadro K2200-$440
HP(103C 1097) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.98
|
16.7%
Very poor
|
17% 19.1 fps
|
16% 20.3 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung MZ7WD240 240GB
123GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPW1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 381 376 376 378 377 374 MB/s
|
76.2%
Very good
|
76% 336 MB/s
|
99% 35.4 MB/s
|
182% 246 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
2TB free
Firmware: HP51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 202 199 201 200 198 MB/s
|
117%
Outstanding
|
121% 166 MB/s
|
151% 1.1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M393A1G40DB0-CPB 2x8GB
2 of 16 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
60.5%
Good
|
63% 22.2 GB/s
|
40% 14 GB/s
|
52% 77.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Z840 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,979 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP Z840 Workstation
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v41stBench 66%, 1,252 samples | 133x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v31stBench 63%, 2,624 samples | 117x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 v41stBench 72%, 529 samples | 102x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples | 151x |
| Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples | 104x |
| Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples | 94x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 120% - Outstanding | Total price: $93 |