Asus M4A79XTD EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics11.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M4A79XTD EVO  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100617
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '23 at 18:55
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144
AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
52.5% Above average
Memory 78.2
1-Core 49.7
2-Core 99.2
49% 75.7 Pts
4-Core 157
8-Core 162
21% 159 Pts
64-Core 166
10% 166 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6770
XFX(1682 3153) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Lighting 13.6
Reflection 15.1
Parallax 12.5
11% 13.7 fps
MRender 10.8
Gravity 11.3
Splatting 18.5
12% 13.5 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
111GB free
Firmware: UE50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 144 69 86 85 83 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.4% Below average
Read 186
Write 148
Mixed 155
SusWrite 104
33% 148 MB/s
4K Read 12.9
4K Write 23.3
4K Mixed 12
47% 16.1 MB/s
DQ Read 106
DQ Write 82.8
DQ Mixed 41.5
46% 76.9 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 53%
Seagate ST3250410AS 250GB
164GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 55 20 22 36 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
26.1% Poor
Read 56.5
Write 74.7
Mixed 41.3
SusWrite 34.3
38% 51.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
132% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 54%
WD Purple 1TB (2014)-$40
913GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 141 143 149 149 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Read 119
Write 112
Mixed 64.9
SusWrite 145
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24% Poor
MC Read 8.9
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 7.3
22% 7.63 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 6.9
19% 6.73 GB/s
Latency 83.9
48% 83.9 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 24%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 64 52 50 7.2" 1280 720 SAM067A SAMSUNG
Typical M4A79XTD EVO Builds (Compare 104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A79XTD EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $111
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback