Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics46.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateNov 25 '17 at 09:01
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8370-$175
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Memory 93
1-Core 71.5
2-Core 145
64% 103 Pts
4-Core 286
8-Core 428
44% 357 Pts
64-Core 427
26% 427 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1246 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.8% Average
Lighting 57
Reflection 63.5
Parallax 74.9
46% 65.1 fps
MRender 65.9
Gravity 56
Splatting 54.3
48% 58.7 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SS DSC2KW240H6 240GB
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LSF Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Read 480
Write 457
Mixed 435
102% 457 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 66.8
4K Mixed 34.1
121% 42.8 MB/s
DQ Read 127
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 76
74% 115 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 90%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
97GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Read 160
Write 119
Mixed 121
100% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.71
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.31
105% 1.08 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.9% Above average
MC Read 22.3
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 18.4
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 12.7
31% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 62.2
64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 758 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback