Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 52% Yacht	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 50% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	56.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	92.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
Motherboard	Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING (all builds)
Memory	7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180808
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 15 '23 at 19:07
Run Duration	213 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	18%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$199 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	80.1% Excellent	Memory 82 1-Core 118 2-Core 224 79% 141 Pts	4-Core 420 8-Core 671 67% 546 Pts	64-Core 1,169 72% 1,169 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 80.1% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Nvidia(10DE 1C03) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	56.7% Above average	Lighting 69.9 Reflection 73.7 Parallax 69.1 57% 70.9 fps	MRender 66.6 Gravity 71.6 Splatting 67.7 56% 68.6 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 128GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 360 232 242 248 262 256 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	92.1% Outstanding	Read 435 Write 410 Mixed 358 SusWrite 267 82% 367 MB/s	4K Read 35.2 4K Write 68.1 4K Mixed 40.9 142% 48.1 MB/s	DQ Read 364 DQ Write 290 DQ Mixed 359 260% 338 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 92.1% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 65GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 286 293 287 278 281 271 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	86.5% Excellent	Read 418 Write 325 Mixed 247 SusWrite 283 71% 318 MB/s	4K Read 26.4 4K Write 74.1 4K Mixed 34 123% 44.8 MB/s	DQ Read 367 DQ Write 290 DQ Mixed 267 217% 308 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 86.5% Great: 134%
Kingston SUV500M8480G 480GB 1,552 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 41GB free Firmware: 003056RR SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 206 53 91 40 43 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	73.5% Very good	Read 443 Write 391 Mixed 349 SusWrite 128 73% 328 MB/s	4K Read 30.6 4K Write 58.5 4K Mixed 36.1 124% 41.7 MB/s	DQ Read 194 DQ Write 236 DQ Mixed 159 135% 196 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 73.5% Great: 94%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 322GB 230 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 194GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 21 21 17 18 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	33% Below average	Read 95.1 Write 94.1 Mixed 60.6 SusWrite 19.7 50% 67.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 33% Great: 95%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2.5TB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 21 21 17 18 18 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	42% Average	Read 126 Write 101 Mixed 75 SusWrite 19.4 60% 80.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 180% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 69%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 597GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 132GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 199 201 196 196 189 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 184 Write 166 Mixed 102 SusWrite 195 119% 162 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 5.1 4K Mixed 1.5 294% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 109%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 215GB 208 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 10GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 16 15 11 9 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	26.1% Poor	Read 78 Write 46.2 Mixed 42.4 SusWrite 12.7 33% 44.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.5 105% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 26.1% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2933 C17 2x8GB 4,229 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	90% Excellent	MC Read 38.2 MC Write 30.1 MC Mixed 31.8 95% 33.4 GB/s	SC Read 20.1 SC Write 26 SC Mixed 22.7 66% 22.9 GB/s	Latency 76.9 52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 90% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,653 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 80%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $138

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $199Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	1,411x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $145Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	541x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $185Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	533x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	321x
RTX 2060Nvidia $290Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	230x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	208x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	175x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	172x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	135x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	246x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	185x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	156x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 96% - Outstanding

Total price: $661

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16