Lenovo 90ED003UUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics33.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 90ED003UUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SKYBAY
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151230
Uptime9.9 Days
Run DateNov 27 '17 at 02:00
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Memory 83.7
1-Core 125
2-Core 246
84% 151 Pts
4-Core 442
8-Core 650
68% 546 Pts
64-Core 659
41% 659 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
MSI(1462 3200) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.64
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33.5% Below average
Lighting 42.8
Reflection 43.1
Parallax 38.2
35% 41.4 fps
MRender 39.3
Gravity 39.8
Splatting 34.7
31% 38 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LF120HCHP-000L1 120GB
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXT03L0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
42.4% Average
Read 499
Write 57.4
Mixed 100
47% 219 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 34.3
4K Mixed 9.91
61% 21.4 MB/s
DQ Read 24.9
DQ Write 25.4
DQ Mixed 10
12% 20.1 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 60%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
836GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 166
Mixed 160
124% 165 MB/s
4K Read 1.28
4K Write 2.32
4K Mixed 0.34
134% 1.31 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 109%
SAMSUNG HD103UJ 1TB
384GB free, PID 2336
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Read 26.3
Write 33.9
Mixed 27.2
38% 29.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.15
4K Mixed 0.25
49% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 21%
SAMSUNG HD103UJ 1TB
218GB free, PID 2336
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
18.4% Very poor
Read 34.5
Write 34.3
Mixed 33.8
44% 34.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.88
4K Mixed 0.35
78% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A5143DB0-CPB 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.2% Very good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 29.1
MC Mixed 23.2
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 24.6
69% 24 GB/s
Latency 73.9
54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90ED003UUS Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Lenovo 90ED003UUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $368
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback