Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515DA_X515DA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics7.76% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive122% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
18 months ago, 18 months ago.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515DA_X515DA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X515DA
Memory1.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220311
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateMar 17 '23 at 16:48
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
35.4% Below average
Memory 36.3
1-Core 68.5
2-Core 114
41% 73.1 Pts
4-Core 185
8-Core 326
31% 256 Pts
64-Core 320
20% 320 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics
Asus(1043 1FBF) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.30.44.13
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
7.76% Terrible
Lighting 9.8
Reflection 8.2
Parallax 16.9
8% 11.6 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 13
Splatting 8.7
7% 8.87 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.76%
Great: 14%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SM2P32A8-256GC1 256GB
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VC0S0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 794 1015 1028 1074 408 215 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 997
Write 1,120
Mixed 909
SusWrite 756
213% 946 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 34.6
4K Mixed 26.9
90% 28.6 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 145
DQ Mixed 178
132% 176 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 122%
Great: 213%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown WHS84S8AZ 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.6% Poor
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 10.6
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 7.4
SC Mixed 8.1
22% 7.83 GB/s
Latency 220
18% 220 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515DA_X515DA Builds (Compare 49 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515DA_X515DA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback