HP ZBook Studio x360 G5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics23.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive184% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP ZBook Studio x360 G5  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 844F
Memory20.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221209
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 27 '23 at 23:31
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9880H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
60.4% Good
Memory 80.4
1-Core 98.1
2-Core 192
71% 124 Pts
4-Core 237
8-Core 231
32% 234 Pts
64-Core 500
31% 500 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P2000
HP(103C 8451) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1607 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 531.41
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
23.7% Poor
Lighting 29
Reflection 35.4
Parallax 32
24% 32.1 fps
MRender 26.7
Gravity 31.2
Splatting 29.1
24% 29 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$106
522GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 950 931 1036 1023 1114 1067 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
184% Outstanding
Read 1,432
Write 1,212
Mixed 1,198
SusWrite 1,020
273% 1,216 MB/s
4K Read 40.9
4K Write 44.4
4K Mixed 59.2
161% 48.2 MB/s
DQ Read 335
DQ Write 233
DQ Mixed 279
210% 282 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 184%
Great: 488%
Crucial P5 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$240
1.5TB free
Firmware: P4CR324 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 932 899 1001 964 1029 992 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
169% Outstanding
Read 1,150
Write 1,044
Mixed 940
SusWrite 969
231% 1,026 MB/s
4K Read 41.5
4K Write 62.4
4K Mixed 49.6
160% 51.2 MB/s
DQ Read 365
DQ Write 252
DQ Mixed 309
231% 309 MB/s
Poor: 162%
This bench: 169%
Great: 389%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown - [0x9B85] CT16G4SFD8266.C16FN 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
61% Good
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 30.2
MC Mixed 16.3
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 27.7
SC Mixed 20.6
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 79.8
50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 61%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZBook Studio x360 G5 Builds (Compare 429 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: HP ZBook Studio x360 G5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback