Today's hottest deals

HP EliteDesk 800 G2 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive56.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G2 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8054
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170605
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 04 '23 at 15:03
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$90
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
69% Good
Memory 83.2
1-Core 102
2-Core 198
73% 128 Pts
4-Core 315
8-Core 337
43% 326 Pts
64-Core 345
21% 345 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 69%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Asus(1043 85F4) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Lighting 17.6
Reflection 17.8
Parallax 17.8
14% 17.7 fps
MRender 15.6
Gravity 18.6
Splatting 16.3
14% 16.8 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
GS1TB 1TB
768GB free (System drive)
Firmware: W0221B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 14 15 111 405 410 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.5% Above average
Read 417
Write 336
Mixed 48.7
SusWrite 190
55% 248 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 61.9
4K Mixed 0.5
67% 28.1 MB/s
DQ Read 174
DQ Write 297
DQ Mixed 0.5
67% 157 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 56%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
364GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 158 152 158 158 161 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Read 145
Write 121
Mixed 69.3
SusWrite 156
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown - [0x9B85] CT8G4DFRA266.C8FP Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
70.1% Very good
MC Read 24.9
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 21.6
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 20.7
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 74.8
53% 74.8 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G2 SFF Builds (Compare 3,146 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G2 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $115
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback