Dell Precision Tower 7910

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics47.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive210% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Precision Tower 7910
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 7910  (all builds)
Memory120.3 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1280 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201019
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 08 '23 at 18:59
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Memory 49.1
1-Core 80.6
2-Core 145
51% 91.5 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 565
51% 428 Pts
64-Core 1,498
93% 1,498 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
EVGA(3842 1970) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 526.86
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.6% Average
Lighting 58.3
Reflection 65
Parallax 58.7
48% 60.7 fps
MRender 65.7
Gravity 59.3
Splatting 52.8
48% 59.3 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
310GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1778 1034 755 754 755 755 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
210% Outstanding
Read 2,044
Write 1,873
Mixed 1,514
SusWrite 972
359% 1,601 MB/s
4K Read 43.2
4K Write 64.9
4K Mixed 54.3
169% 54.1 MB/s
DQ Read 430
DQ Write 255
DQ Mixed 361
264% 349 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 210%
Great: 346%
Avago MR9341-8i 1TB
694GB free
Firmware: 4.65
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 54 55 55 57 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 130
Write 52.4
Mixed 46.2
SusWrite 54.9
52% 71 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.4
99% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 117%
Avago MR9341-8i 500GB
272GB free
Firmware: 4.65
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 32 36 36 38 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Read 142
Write 32.2
Mixed 37.6
SusWrite 35.3
45% 61.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.5
136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 108%
Avago MR9341-8i 500GB
293GB free
Firmware: 4.65
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 127 125 126 126 126 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
68.4% Good
Read 112
Write 115
Mixed 82.1
SusWrite 126
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 108%
Avago MR9341-8i 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 4.65
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 46 46 46 46 46 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 69% Great: 113%
Avago MR9341-8i 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 4.65
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 46 46 46 46 46 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 69% Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA84GR7MFR4N-UH 4x31.8GB
4 of 16 slots used
127GB RIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
61.3% Good
MC Read 26
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 21.8
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 17.9
44% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 164
24% 164 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision Tower 7910 Builds (Compare 1,185 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 7910

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback