Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS PRO-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics50.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte B450 AORUS PRO
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B450 AORUS PRO-CF  (all builds)
Memory18.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180619
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 12 '23 at 18:45
Run Duration346 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
69% Good
Memory 73.5
1-Core 117
2-Core 221
76% 137 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 658
60% 502 Pts
64-Core 878
54% 878 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 69%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
MSI(1462 3161) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 526.47
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.2% Above average
Lighting 62.5
Reflection 67.6
Parallax 67.9
51% 66 fps
MRender 65.6
Gravity 62.3
Splatting 53.2
49% 60.4 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 240GB 240GB
106GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0407A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 192 222 205 229 188 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Read 461
Write 219
Mixed 189
SusWrite 210
60% 270 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 34.6
4K Mixed 9.7
59% 20.9 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 84.4
DQ Mixed 51.4
56% 96.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 90%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
155GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 95 97 94 97 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
57% Above average
Read 102
Write 110
Mixed 59.5
SusWrite 96.1
67% 92 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 57%
Great: 62%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
83GB free
Firmware: CR100-12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 43 43 42 42 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
25.9% Poor
Read 47.1
Write 54.6
Mixed 35.6
SusWrite 42.8
33% 45 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 44%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$70
896GB free
Firmware: JP4OA39C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 122 126 118 125 124 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Read 122
Write 112
Mixed 58.9
SusWrite 123
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 74%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$90
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 138 142 132 141 141 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Read 144
Write 98.4
Mixed 105
SusWrite 138
90% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 96%
Flash USB Disk 4TB
4TB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 56.5
Write 9.5
Mixed 2.5
19% 22.8 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Mixed 0
86% 7.75 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 71%
WDC WD10 TPVT-00U4RT1 1TB
199GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 59.7
Write 24.9
Mixed 21.7
38% 35.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.6
37% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 29%
ASMT 2115 480GB
419GB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 250
Write 193
Mixed 11
164% 151 MB/s
4K Read 15.3
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.4
237% 6.87 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 188%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK8GX4M2A2666C16 CMK8GX4M2A2666C16 24GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
66.3% Good
MC Read 24.6
MC Write 23.4
MC Mixed 21.8
66% 23.3 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 24.5
SC Mixed 21.8
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 93.6
43% 93.6 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B450 AORUS PRO-CF Builds (Compare 4,512 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS PRO-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $422
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback