Intel X79M-S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics43.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
MotherboardIntel X79M-S  (all builds)
Memory20.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 22 '23 at 02:24
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
64.6% Good
Memory 72.7
1-Core 76.5
2-Core 152
59% 100 Pts
4-Core 304
8-Core 594
53% 449 Pts
64-Core 952
59% 952 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-2048SP
AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1284 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.4.1
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
43.6% Average
Lighting 53.7
Reflection 58.2
Parallax 74.1
44% 62 fps
MRender 58.6
Gravity 60.3
Splatting 44
43% 54.3 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 128GB 128GB
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1A30Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 206 215 163 213 213 MB/s
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.2% Above average
Read 241
Write 218
Mixed 204
SusWrite 201
49% 216 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 51
4K Mixed 9.6
82% 29.6 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 162
DQ Mixed 12.3
44% 94.8 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 93%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
315GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 112 113 113 114 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
63.1% Good
Read 107
Write 108
Mixed 69.9
SusWrite 113
73% 99.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$23
466GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 119 120 120 121 120 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
68.6% Good
Read 119
Write 116
Mixed 73.4
SusWrite 120
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 69%
Realtek RTL9210B-CG 512GB
339GB free, PID 9210
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 22 27 27 26 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Read 64.4
Write 17.5
Mixed 21.3
SusWrite 24.2
36% 31.8 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 2.3
134% 5.77 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMY16GX3M2A24 Kingston 99P5474-014.A Kingston 99P5474-014.A 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.5% Average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 14.7
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 10.2
SC Mixed 9.7
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 95.4
42% 95.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79M-S Builds (Compare 595 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Intel X79M-S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback