Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 31% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	43.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N5095 1,699 User benchmarks, average bench 43% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	24.5% Poor	Memory 28.4 1-Core 64.9 2-Core 122 38% 71.9 Pts	4-Core 118 8-Core 125 16% 121 Pts	64-Core 170 10% 170 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 24.5% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 4,536 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Device(0000 0000) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2115 Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	1.43% Terrible	Lighting 2.6 Reflection 3.8 Parallax 2.6 2% 3 fps	MRender 0.1 Gravity 0.2 Splatting 0.1 0% 0.13 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.43% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Netac 256GB 256GB 2,108 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 84GB free (System drive) Firmware: U0326A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 59 71 54 69 34 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	43.8% Average	Read 341 Write 147 Mixed 65 SusWrite 55.9 33% 152 MB/s	4K Read 20.7 4K Write 46.6 4K Mixed 17.5 78% 28.3 MB/s	DQ Read 97.5 DQ Write 44 DQ Mixed 3.2 20% 48.2 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 43.8% Great: 97%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 2x6GB 95 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2 of 2 slots used 12GB Row of chips LPDDR4 4267 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	38.9% Below average	MC Read 10.1 MC Write 20.7 MC Mixed 15.1 44% 15.3 GB/s	SC Read 5 SC Write 10.3 SC Mixed 5.7 20% 7 GB/s	Latency 264 15% 264 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 100%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 42%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N5095IntelBench 43%, 1,699 samples	4x
Celeron J4115IntelBench 34%, 544 samples	4x
Celeron J4125IntelBench 35%, 2,594 samples	2x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	6x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 2%, 4,536 samples	4x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16